Do Not Mind-Control Me, Bro!

MKULTRA Isn't the End of the Story. It May Be the Beginning.

For decades, MKULTRA has occupied a strange place in American history. Once dismissed as fantasy, it is now an acknowledged CIA program involving experiments with drugs, hypnosis, behavioral modification, and other controversial techniques conducted during the Cold War. While many records were destroyed in the 1970s, surviving documents and congressional investigations confirmed that the program existed, even as many details remain unknown.

Recently, the subject returned to Capitol Hill as members of Congress revisited MKULTRA in the broader context of government transparency and public trust. The hearings weren't about proving cinematic mind control. They were about understanding what government agencies did, what records survived, and what lessons should be learned.

That's where the conversation becomes interesting.

MKULTRA has evolved from a historical program into a cultural metaphor. Every generation seems to reinvent the concept of "mind control" to fit its own anxieties. Yesterday it was hypnosis and LSD. Today it's algorithms, social media, targeted advertising, recommendation engines, and AI-driven personalization. The mechanisms are different, but the underlying question remains remarkably consistent: How much influence can institutions exert over what we think, believe, and pay attention to?

FMPU isn't interested in shouting, "They're controlling your mind!" Nor is it interested in dismissing every concern with a wave of the hand.

Instead, we ask a more useful question:

Where is the line between persuasion, propaganda, psychological influence, and genuine manipulation?

History shows that governments, advertisers, political campaigns, and media organizations have all studied human behavior. That doesn't mean every modern technology is an MKULTRA sequel. It does mean the public should understand how influence works.

FMPU Angle: Don't Mind-Control Me, Bro!

The greatest defense against manipulation isn't paranoia.

It's curiosity, media literacy, and the willingness to ask difficult questions before accepting easy answers.

Read More

jsm Saturday, July 18, 2026  No comment

THE FOUR-FOOT UFO AND THE NUCLEAR BOMB FACTORY

The UAP story gaining the most traction is not new footage from somebody’s porch or another podcast guest promising history-changing evidence sometime after the commercial break.

It's that newly resurfaced government report describing a small, silent, diamond-shaped object near the Pantex nuclear-weapons facility outside Amarillo, Texas.  FMPU has been discussing Panrex since the recent data dump by the government last week.  

According to the released account, Pantex personnel observed the object on September 1, 2015. Witnesses estimated it was approximately four feet tall and two feet wide, moving only 10 to 15 miles per hour. It reportedly changed direction and accelerated while two security officers attempted to follow it. The facility temporarily entered lockdown, surveillance equipment recorded grainy imagery, and the evidence was eventually provided to the FBI.

The report emerged through the government’s PURSUE archive, whose fourth public release was cleared on July 10, 2026. That archive contains documents, videos and imagery drawn from decades of military and intelligence reporting.

Now for the irritating part: the available image does not resemble the Death Star hovering over Texas. It resembles an indistinct object photographed by equipment apparently designed to preserve uncertainty.

That has produced the usual camps.

Believers emphasize the nuclear connection, the object’s reported silence and its apparent reaction when pursued. They see another entry in the long history of UFO reports near atomic facilities. Skeptics point to the object’s modest size, slow speed, contradictory color descriptions and poor imagery. A balloon, drone or ordinary airborne debris remains possible. The released report itself described the object’s behavior as non-threatening and did not identify it as extraterrestrial technology.

FMPU OPINION: The real story is not that a four-foot alien refrigerator inspected America’s nuclear arsenal.

The story is that a supposedly secure weapons facility could observe, chase and photograph an unknown object—and eleven years later the public receives a blurry picture and a narrative with enough holes to accommodate every religion in ufology.

This is disclosure by algorithm: release a mountain of material, allow the strangest thumbnail to escape, and watch social media convert uncertainty into opposing certainties. One side announces aliens. The other announces balloons. Both arrive before the evidence finishes loading.

That is Magic Pop in its modern form: government paperwork enters the machine, cultural mythology comes out wearing sunglasses.

The Pantex object deserves examination because unidentified activity near nuclear infrastructure is a legitimate security issue, regardless of origin. But disclosure cannot mean merely opening the filing cabinet and throwing its contents into the digital wind.

Release the best available footage. Explain the sensor limitations. Publish the investigative chain.

Otherwise, the government is not resolving the mystery.

It is franchising it.

Read More

jsm Friday, July 17, 2026  No comment

FMPU Duh: UFO CONTENT IS ROBUST - BUT EVIDENCE IS MISSING, SAYS SCIENCE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

When I set out to create a blog that would capture minds as curious as mine, I made a promise to stay as true to be my beliefs as possible (I don't have many to begin with), be it cynical, naive or what's in my nature to remain motivated to strive to learn a thing or two.  We can drop the spectacle for a moment and look at what actually happened without feeling bad.  I have made the mistake of coming on too strong at times, drawing some ire from my peers.  Somehow, my "heroes" of  the journalistic world of the strange did/do it so much more diplomatically.  I'd like to think that the hard work pays off, and some of the talents in the field are ace researchers.

But today I found out the fastest-moving UAP discussion didn’t involve a crashed saucer, a congressional confession, or another retired official promising humanity-shattering evidence after returning from the commercial break.

It involved scientists admitting that the UFO field has an evidence problem.  

On July 14, the Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies conducted a public Reddit AMA featuring researchers with backgrounds in astronautical engineering, physics, machine learning, defense systems and marine geophysics. The organization describes itself as an interdisciplinary nonprofit committed to evidence-based UAP investigation.

That may sound less thrilling than “ALIEN MOTHERSHIP ABOVE ARIZONA,” but stay with me.  [Hint: Do you need another reason to reddit?]

When asked what unrestricted government radar, infrared, telemetry and satellite data might accomplish, SCU representatives said researchers could eliminate conventional objects, correlate multiple forms of observation and isolate a smaller number of genuinely anomalous cases. They emphasized that reliable conclusions require corroborating data from more than one sensor type.

Then came the important part.

Asked about building a public archive of original UAP evidence, SCU acknowledged that the field suffers from a shortage of primary videos, missing metadata, uncertain provenance, repeated compression and absent chains of custody. Creating a scientifically useful repository would require qualified leadership and substantial funding.  More money?  Any of you having trouble finding a  decent job out there?

Meanwhile, the federal government’s current UAP archive openly states that its published cases remain unresolved partly because available information is insufficient. AARO’s own case descriptions repeatedly caution that a moving “area of contrast” is not automatically an analytical conclusion about an extraordinary object.

Here are the competing viewpoints.

Believers argue that classified multi-sensor data may contain the decisive evidence missing from public debate. Skeptics answer that “unresolved” usually means inadequate information—not extraterrestrials. The scientists occupy the irritating but necessary middle: most reports eventually prove ordinary, while a smaller group remains unexplained because the data are incomplete.

FMPU opinion: the central battle in disclosure is no longer believer versus de-bunker. It is evidence versus circulation. And they are asking for more money. 

Algorithms reward the most shocking imagery, the loudest witness and the most emotionally satisfying explanation. They do not reward metadata, calibration records or somebody saying, “We cannot determine that yet. Plus we are drained."  Please consider donating to FMPU. 

That is where the alien clown comes back in. He’s not here to reveal the truth—he’s here to keep the show going. Every blurry clip feeds the drumbeat. Every viral claim fills the jar. The spectacle, the promise, the hope pays better than the answer.

Modern mythology is now manufactured at upload speed. A blurry object becomes a craft, the craft becomes a fleet and the fleet becomes an invasion before anyone locates the original file.

Disclosure may eventually arrive. But until evidence can survive the content machine, we will continue receiving infinite revelation with remarkably little revealed—and the clown will keep playing.

Read More

jsm Wednesday, July 15, 2026  No comment

FMPU Book Club Book Of The Month: Valis

 Philip K. Dick's Valis is an amazing read, and this audio book is a educational, fun, harrowing, adventurous romp that summarized and helped me define a number of concepts.  I'm listening to it again and I hope you have a chance to either grab a hard-copy, or have a listen. Either way, I doubt you'll be disappointed.

chapter 1 20:00 

chapter 2 48:03 

chapter 3 1:15:25 

chapter 4 2:02:14 

chapter 5 2:42:50 

chapter 6 3:24:57 

chapter 7 4:06:17 

chapter 8 4:45:35 

chapter 9 5:29:23 

chapter 10 6:02:08 

chapter 11 6:42:05 

chapter 12 7:30:30 

chapter 13 

Read More

jsm Wednesday, July 15, 2026  No comment

Chronicus Chronicles

 

Read More

jsm Tuesday, July 14, 2026  No comment

The Partisan UFO Discussion: Is The Alien Agenda Left or Right Based?

Mt. Disclosure aka Mt. Shushmore

An Introduction to a Larger Investigation

One of the more intriguing questions in modern ufology has little to do with lights in the sky. It concerns the people talking about them.

Has the UFO discussion gradually become associated with one political ideology, or is that perception itself a product of media ecosystems?

This is a question worth exploring—but not answering prematurely.

Popular culture often gives the impression that UFOs belong to the political left. Hollywood has certainly contributed to that perception. Many prominent filmmakers and producers who have embraced UFO themes have also been associated with broadly progressive politics. Steven Spielberg's recent UFO-centered work, for example, has been interpreted by some critics as reflecting contemporary liberal cultural narratives, though others simply view it as science fiction and entertainment.

At the same time, the historical record refuses to fit neatly into partisan categories.

Jimmy Carter, a Democrat, famously reported witnessing an unexplained aerial object before becoming president and later expressed interest in government openness regarding UFO information.

Ronald Reagan, a Republican, repeatedly spoke about how humanity might unite if confronted with an extraterrestrial presence, referencing the idea in several major speeches.

George H. W. Bush, whose career was deeply rooted in national security and intelligence, said little publicly about UFOs during his presidency.

Bill Clinton expressed curiosity about Area 51 and UFO files, reportedly asking aides to examine government records, while acknowledging he found no confirmed evidence of extraterrestrial visitation.

George W. Bush rarely engaged the topic publicly.

Barack Obama often joked about UFOs but also acknowledged that military footage depicts objects that remain unexplained, while emphasizing that "unexplained" does not mean extraterrestrial.

Donald Trump publicly stated he was briefed on UFOs and remained skeptical, yet his administration oversaw a period during which congressional attention and government transparency on UAP issues accelerated, including the establishment of reporting mechanisms that continued under subsequent administrations.  Both sides seem intent on keeping a balanced pov amongst the huddled masses. 

Taken together, this history suggests something more complicated than a left-versus-right debate.

Perhaps the better question is not which political party "owns" ufology.

Perhaps it is who currently shapes the conversation.

Former military personnel.

Intelligence officials.

Scientists.

Journalists.

Podcasters.

Hollywood storytellers.

Independent researchers.

Each brings different assumptions, audiences, and incentives.

That is the investigation FMPU intends to pursue.

This series will not begin with conclusions. It will begin with data.

Who are the loudest voices in today's disclosure movement?

What are their backgrounds?

What do they actually say?

Do discernible ideological patterns emerge—or does the modern UFO conversation transcend traditional political categories altogether?

The answer may tell us as much about contemporary media as it does about unidentified aerial phenomena themselves.

Read More

jsm Monday, July 13, 2026  No comment

Critical Gorilla

Read More

jsm Monday, July 13, 2026  No comment

MONOLITHS ON THE MOON: DISCLOSURE FINALLY HIRES STANLEY KUBRICK

The fastest-moving UAP story this weekend is not another fuzzy light, confused balloon, or Navy video apparently filmed through a jar of mayonnaise. It is a claim that the United States government possesses unreleased photographs of enormous, monolith-like structures on the Moon.

Former Pentagon UAP investigator Luis Elizondo said during an appearance on Disclosure Tonight that Apollo-era imagery may show angular structures with pronounced right-angle cuts. He suggested the photographs could be released publicly soon. No photographs, supporting documents, precise locations, or independently verified measurements accompanied the claim.

Naturally, the story hit social media wearing tap shoes.

Accounts on X began repeating the “giant lunar monolith” language, while Reddit discussions split into the traditional UAP food groups: true believers ordering curtains for the Moon base, skeptics demanding actual evidence, and exhausted longtime observers asking how many times “soon” can be used before it legally becomes a geological era.

Here is the verified part: NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has studied the Moon since 2009 and mapped nearly its entire surface in unprecedented detail. NASA and USGS maintain extensive lunar imagery and topographic datasets, including near-global maps created from multiple cameras and laser-altimetry measurements. None of those official resources presently identifies artificial monoliths.

That does not logically prove that every strange feature has been explained. It does mean the burden now belongs to the person making the extraordinary claim. Coordinates would help. Original negatives would help. Chain of custody would help. A photograph larger than a podcast thumbnail would be a delightful technological breakthrough.

Supporters argue that Elizondo’s background gives the allegation unusual weight and that newly established government disclosure efforts could produce material previously hidden from public view. Critics answer that credentials are not evidence and note that Elizondo has repeatedly made dramatic claims without releasing the underlying material needed for independent analysis. Both positions deserve to be represented accurately; neither turns an assertion into a confirmed lunar construction project.

FMPU opinion: this story matters less because lunar monoliths have been proved—they have not—and more because it demonstrates the new machinery of disclosure culture. One provocative sentence becomes a headline, the headline becomes an image, the image becomes a belief, and the belief begins collecting followers before the evidence has located its pants.

That is Magic Pop in action: mythology manufactured at algorithmic speed.

Maybe the pictures arrive tomorrow and human history falls down the stairs. Until then, we have the oldest structure in the UFO field: an enormous rectangular promise marked COMING SOON.

Read More

jsm Sunday, July 12, 2026  No comment

The Pentagon Just Dumped More UFO Files. Now Comes the Hard Part: Thinking

On July 10, the Department of War released the fourth tranche of records under its Presidential Unsealing and Reporting System for UAP Encounters, or PURSUE. The new batch contains 40 files—14 documents, 19 videos, four audio recordings and three images—covering incidents from 1948 through 2025.

That is the verified news.

Now everybody please put down the alien-shaped bong and take one respectful step away from the internet.

Among the documents is a 1949 Air Force analysis referencing the fatal 1948 pursuit by pilot Thomas Mantell, whose final transmission reportedly described an enormous metallic object before his aircraft crashed. Investigators suspected oxygen deprivation contributed to the disaster. Another newly published transcript records scientists at Los Alamos discussing unusual “green fireballs” near the nuclear laboratory and failing to reach a definitive explanation.

The collection also includes a 2019 Navy range-fouler report in which an experienced aviator described an object displaying flight characteristics unlike anything he had encountered during 28 years of military work. Infrared recordings from more recent military encounters are included as well.

Disclosure advocates will reasonably argue that this material proves the government possessed a deeper and longer-running interest in anomalous objects than officials historically admitted. They are right about the historical importance. These records show that military personnel, intelligence agencies and scientists repeatedly documented incidents they could not immediately resolve.

Skeptics will answer that “unresolved” does not mean extraterrestrial. They are also right. Missing sensor data, uncertain distances, atmospheric effects, classified aircraft and incomplete archival context can convert ordinary confusion into permanent mythology.

FMPU opinion: The real revelation is not that aliens have been confirmed. They have not. The revelation is that the government has finally discovered the perfect disclosure format: release mountains of fascinating material, invite the public to “decide for themselves,” and let algorithms turn every ambiguous pixel into its own religion.

This is Magic Pop in its purest form. History, military bureaucracy, trauma, technology and folklore are fed into the content machine. The machine spits out certainty customized to each viewer.

Believers receive confirmation. Skeptics receive comedy. Influencers receive thumbnails.

The rest of us receive 40 new files and the ancient responsibility nobody wants anymore:

Actually reading them.

Read More

jsm Saturday, July 11, 2026  No comment

Revelation of the Method Is Here, And There's Nothing You Can Do to Stop It

 

Suppose, for a moment, that Michael A. Hoffman's most unsettling idea isn't entirely wrong.

Not necessarily the specifics.

The pattern.

Hoffman coined and popularized the phrase "Revelation of the Method" to describe what he saw as a recurring phenomenon: institutions of power gradually revealing aspects of their own methods—not out of guilt or transparency, but because the revelation itself becomes part of the psychological process. Whether one accepts that framework or not, it raises an uncomfortable question:

What if the modern world doesn't hide nearly as much as it used to?

Look around.

Government agencies openly discuss surveillance capabilities that would have sounded dystopian twenty years ago. Artificial intelligence summarizes our conversations. Algorithms quietly decide what billions of people see every day. Corporations collect oceans of behavioral data. Cameras are everywhere. Facial recognition improves. Digital identities expand. Much of this isn't hidden; it's described in policy papers, congressional hearings, product launches, and quarterly earnings calls.

The surprise isn't that these systems exist.

The surprise is how quickly extraordinary becomes ordinary.

This is where Hoffman's idea becomes interesting—not as proven doctrine, but as a lens. Perhaps the most effective form of influence isn't concealment. Perhaps it's normalization. If enough information is released gradually, debated endlessly, and folded into everyday life, resistance often fades into familiarity.

That dynamic isn't unique to governments. Technology companies, advertisers, political campaigns, and media organizations all compete to shape perception. Every notification, recommendation engine, viral clip, and trending topic participates in an economy where attention has become one of the world's most valuable resources.

At FMPU, we spend a great deal of time examining UFO disclosure, media narratives, and institutional transparency. The same question appears again and again:

Are we witnessing revelation—or simply information arriving at the speed of the modern news cycle?

The distinction matters.

History is full of genuine disclosures that improved public understanding. It is also full of rumors, myths, and narratives that evolved far beyond the evidence available. Sorting one from the other requires skepticism in more than one direction.

Perhaps the greatest trick isn't convincing people to believe everything.

It's convincing them they no longer need to ask questions.

Whether Hoffman's framework ultimately proves insightful or not, one lesson remains valuable: pay attention to how information is presented, not only what is presented.

Because every age tells stories about itself.

The digital age tells them faster than any civilization before it.

And if there is a revelation of the method happening today, it may not arrive with a secret handshake or a coded ritual.

It may arrive as a software update that everyone clicks "Accept" without reading.

Read More

jsm Saturday, July 11, 2026  No comment