FMPU INTELLIGENCE BRIEF #008

FMPU INTELLIGENCE BRIEF #008

Lockheed Walked Into the Saucer Machine. Somebody Hide the Procurement Forms.

Verified reporting: The fastest-growing UAP topic is still the claim that Avi Loeb, chair of the Trump administration’s UAP Science Advisory Council, was told by a former Lockheed Martin executive that crash-retrieval allegations involving the company were “not wrong.” The claim was discussed on Rep. Eric Burlison’s Fresh Freedom podcast, amplified by the New York Post, and is currently active on r/UFOs and X-linked disclosure accounts. Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman have not publicly confirmed the allegations.

The broader context matters. AP reported that Loeb was picked to lead a new UAP scientific advisory council tied to a 2026 transparency push and a UAP Governance Board under ODNI. The Guardian reported that Loeb’s group has requested classified Pentagon data and plans to advise the White House directly.

AARO’s official position remains more sober than a monk at a tax audit. It says UAP are objects or phenomena not immediately identifiable and that its work uses a rigorous, scientific, data-driven framework. Its public imagery page still includes a mix of unresolved reports, cases under analysis, and ordinary explanations.

The skeptic view is simple: unnamed executive chatter is not evidence. It may be misunderstanding, rumor, foreign-tech recovery, classified aviation history, or Washington telephone played inside a defense contractor gift shop.

The disclosure view is also fair: naming contractors changes the battlefield. If extraordinary programs exist outside normal public oversight, Congress should ask questions. Even if the answer is “no aliens, just very expensive weird machinery,” taxpayers deserve more than a fog machine and a black Sharpie.

FMPU opinion: This is where the UFO myth leaves the cornfield and enters the invoice.

The saucer used to mean wonder. Now it means jurisdiction.

Congress wants documents. Scientists want data. Contractors want silence. Reddit wants combustion. YouTube wants a face screaming beside a glowing disc. X wants everyone mad before breakfast.

That is Magic Pop: mystery processed through institutions, monetized through platforms, and sold back to us as revelation-flavored caffeine.

Maybe there is a craft. Maybe there is only paperwork with a guilty mustache. Either way, the story is evolving. Disclosure is no longer just asking, “Are we alone?”

It is asking, “Who has the files, who has the materials, who signed the contract, and why does the truth always seem to have a nondisclosure agreement?”

FMPU RADAR

Field Temperature: Very hot
Evidence Level: Claim, not proof
Government Angle: Increasing
Contractor Angle: Explosive
Algorithmic Velocity: Maximum
Rabbit Hole Potential: Bring coffee, skepticism, and a shovel.

JP Prediction

The next serious move will be subpoenas, contractor testimony, or document demands—not another shaky orb clip.

What Everyone Else Is Missing

Disclosure is no longer fighting for belief.

It is fighting for jurisdiction.lock

Read More

jsm Tuesday, July 07, 2026  No comment

FMPU INTELLIGENCE BRIEF #007

The UFO Story Got a Harvard Lab Coat. Everybody Please Stop Licking the Beaker.

Verified reporting: The strongest UAP signal right now is the appointment of Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb to lead a new scientific advisory council focused on UAP national-security questions. AP reported that the Trump administration picked Loeb, known for controversial alien-life theories, to lead the council as part of a broader 2026 transparency push that includes a UAP Governance Board under the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

The Guardian also reported that Loeb’s group has requested classified Pentagon data and intends to advise the White House directly. AARO, meanwhile, still defines UAP as objects or phenomena not immediately identifiable and says it uses a rigorous scientific, data-driven framework.

So what happened?

The UFO world got exactly what it keeps demanding: science, access, structure, and a recognizable name.

Naturally, half the room immediately started throwing chairs.

The skeptic view: Loeb is a polarizing choice. Critics argue he has promoted extraordinary alien hypotheses ahead of stronger evidence, and that national-security UAP work requires more than cosmic imagination and a Harvard letterhead. AP noted that some scientific peers accuse him of bypassing peer review and pushing unsubstantiated ideas.

The disclosure view: At least someone is asking for data instead of vibes. Loeb says he plans to treat UAP as a grounded security and science problem while staying open to surprising conclusions if the evidence supports them. That is not crazy. That is what the field should have been doing before everyone turned orb footage into digital incense.

FMPU opinion: This is the real fork in the road.

UAP can become science, or it can remain content.

Science says: collect better data, check sensors, compare explanations, publish methods, survive criticism.

Content says: slap “ALIEN COUNCIL CONFIRMED” over a thumbnail and let the algorithm eat the village.

The funny part is that both camps need each other. Science needs public pressure to get records opened. The disclosure crowd needs science so the whole thing does not become a traveling circus with night-vision goggles.

That is the Magic Pop layer: the UFO has become a cultural synthesizer. Government secrecy, academic ambition, military anxiety, YouTube hysteria, Reddit theology, and X outrage all get plugged into the same machine.

The sound it makes is not disclosure yet.

It is feedback.

FMPU RADAR

Field Temperature: Hot
Credibility: Medium-high, pending actual access
Media Hype: Rising fast
Government Transparency: Moving, but wearing concrete shoes
Algorithmic Velocity: Extremely high
Rabbit Hole Potential: Do not operate after midnight

JP Prediction

Loeb’s council will not settle the UFO question. But it may force the field to choose between evidence and entertainment.

What Everyone Else Is Missing

The real disclosure test is not whether scientists enter the UFO field.

It is whether the UFO field can survive scientists.

Read More

jsm Monday, July 06, 2026  No comment

Vyzygoth and Joe Bonanno Discuss Aldous Huxley

Before podcasts became polished products and algorithms decided what was "recommended," there were voices like Vyzygoth—restlessly connecting history, philosophy, propaganda, literature, and the hidden architecture of modern culture. Through programs like Think or Be Eaten, Beyond the Grassy Knoll, and The Alembic Files, he cultivated conversations that rewarded curiosity over certainty and encouraged listeners to question the stories society takes for granted.

This conversation featuring Aldous Huxley's enduring challenge—whether we choose to think for ourselves or simply become consumed by the systems around us—captures that spirit perfectly. Whether you agree with every conclusion is almost beside the point. The value lies in wrestling with difficult ideas, following unexpected connections, and remembering that independent thought has always been a risky but worthwhile pursuit.

Sometimes the most interesting rabbit holes aren't the ones that promise answers—they're the ones that teach you how to ask better questions.  In some minds he's a legend. In the early days of blogging and eventually podcasting, Vyz was an important piece of the puzzle.  I was happy to find these recordings posted by William Ramsay, so there's plenty of excellent recordings to scour through for some good points.

 

 

Read More

jsm Sunday, July 05, 2026  No comment

FMPU INTELLIGENCE BRIEF #006

Washington Didn't Confirm Aliens. It Confirmed Something Almost as Interesting.

For years, the UFO conversation lived in motel conference rooms, AM radio call-ins, and documentaries narrated by someone who sounded like they hadn't slept since Roswell.

Now it's walking the halls of Capitol Hill.

Verified reporting: The biggest UAP story over the past day remains the growing fallout from Disclosure Forum 2026, held in the historic Kennedy Caucus Room of the Russell Senate Office Building. The event assembled members of Congress, former intelligence officials, scientists, journalists, and disclosure advocates to discuss UAP oversight, public transparency, science, and national security. The fact that this conversation occurred in one of Washington's most recognizable political venues—not at a convention hotel—is itself becoming the story.

The forum also generated fresh attention after Rep. Eric Burlison discussed an alleged unreleased recording connected to the famous 1952 Washington UFO incidents. According to reports, the recording is said to document conversations between Air Force officials and scientists and may eventually become public. At present, however, the tape has not been publicly released or independently verified.

Meanwhile, the official government position has barely budged.

The Presidential Unsealing and Reporting System for UAP Encounters (PURSUE) continues publishing historical records, with its third tranche released on June 12. Those files contain numerous unresolved reports—but no confirmed evidence of extraterrestrial technology.

The skeptical position deserves to be heard.

A political forum is not physical evidence. Old tapes—even authentic ones—may simply reveal how confused officials were seventy years ago. Government transparency is valuable, but transparency should not be confused with validation.

The disclosure position deserves equal treatment.

Congressional attention, historical document releases, and public forums represent real institutional change. Even if every unexplained case ultimately has an ordinary explanation, greater openness about government investigations serves the public interest.

FMPU Perspective

Here's the part that fascinates me.

The UFO itself may no longer be the main character.

The distribution system is.

Congress generates legitimacy.

Scientists generate caution.

Government generates documents.

YouTube generates thumbnails.

Reddit generates theories.

X generates outrage.

The algorithm stitches all of it together into one giant cultural feedback loop where mystery spreads faster than measurement.

That is today's Magic Pop.

Not because it proves we're being visited.

Because it demonstrates how modern mythology is manufactured in real time.

Every generation has its campfire.

Ours happens to fit in a smartphone.

---

FMPU RADAR

Field Temperature: 🔥 Hot

Government Transparency: Slowly increasing

Scientific Momentum: Moderate

Media Saturation: High

Algorithmic Velocity: Maximum

Rabbit Hole Potential: Proceed with coffee and skepticism.

---

JP Prediction

The next meaningful development won't be another viral orb video.

It will be whether Congress can convert today's public enthusiasm into concrete oversight, additional document releases, or substantive hearings.

---

What Everyone Else Is Missing

The disclosure movement is no longer fighting for belief.

It's fighting for institutional permanence.

Read More

jsm Sunday, July 05, 2026  No comment

FMPU INTELLIGENCE BRIEF #005

Disclosure Went to Washington. The Algorithm Brought Snacks.

Verified reporting: The fastest-growing UAP topic right now is the media aftershock from Disclosure Forum 2026, a UAP transparency event held in the Kennedy Caucus Room of the Russell Senate Office Building. The forum brought together lawmakers, disclosure advocates, scientists, journalists, and whistleblower-world figures to discuss UAP secrecy, oversight, national security, public trust, and what happens when the flying-saucer file cabinet gets dragged into polite government lighting. [1]

Vanity Fair’s new coverage is the tell. This is no longer just blurry-dot theater for midnight Reddit monks. The article frames the forum as evidence that the disclosure movement is gaining political and cultural legitimacy. [1]

At the same time, the New York Post reported that Rep. Eric Burlison said a long-hidden audio recording connected to the famous 1952 Washington, D.C. UFO wave may be released, allegedly involving Air Force officials and scientists discussing the sightings. [2] That claim is not the same as the tape being public, verified, or explosive. But in UFO-land, “possible old tape” is enough to make the internet start chewing drywall.

AARO, meanwhile, continues presenting UAP as a data problem, defining them as objects or phenomena not immediately identifiable and saying its work uses a rigorous scientific framework. [3] The Department of War’s UAP release page also confirms a third tranche of records was released on June 12, 2026. [4]

The skeptic view: None of this proves aliens. A forum is not evidence. A tape claim is not a tape. A declassified file is not automatically a crashed saucer wearing a nametag. Recent reporting on the June file releases emphasized unresolved cases, glowing orbs, discs, and odd objects, but no conclusive proof of extraterrestrial life. [5]

The disclosure view: The point is pressure. Public forums, congressional attention, document releases, and historical records are how secrecy gets cornered. If the answer is drones, balloons, optical effects, military tech, or bad sensors, show the work. If it is something stranger, stop treating reality like a members-only buffet.

FMPU opinion: The real phenomenon this week is not in the sky. It is in the distribution system.

Congress wants oversight. Scientists want instruments. AARO wants procedure. Media wants a story. Reddit wants receipts. YouTube wants a thumbnail that looks like God got subpoenaed. X wants a fistfight with footnotes.

And the algorithm wants all of it.

That is the modern UFO machine: part national-security inquiry, part spiritual hunger, part entertainment product, part Magic Pop feedback loop. The saucer is now a media instrument. It hums when attention touches it.

FMPU RADAR

Field Temperature: Hot
Credibility: Medium
Media Hype: Rising
Government Transparency: Moving slowly
Algorithmic Velocity: Extremely high
Rabbit Hole Potential: Illegal after midnight

JP Prediction

The next big wave will not come from a new alien corpse story. It will come from whether this forum energy becomes hearings, subpoenas, released records, or the actual 1952 tape.

What Everyone Else Is Missing

Disclosure is not just the release of secrets.

It is the public learning who profits when mystery becomes content.

Read More

jsm Sunday, July 05, 2026  No comment

FMPU INTELLIGENCE BRIEF #004

The 1952 UFO Tape Is Coming. So Is the Content Swarm.

Verified reporting: The fastest-growing UAP story right now is the claim that a long-hidden audio recording tied to the famous 1952 Washington, D.C. UFO wave may soon be released. Rep. Eric Burlison reportedly said at Disclosure Forum 2026 that MIT’s Lincoln Laboratory has agreed to release a recording involving Air Force officials and scientists discussing the 1952 Washington UFO events. [1]

That is the sort of sentence that makes the UFO internet sit up straight, spill coffee, and start abusing the word “bombshell” before breakfast.

The 1952 case matters because it is one of the old cathedral stories of American UFO mythology: objects reportedly seen over Washington, D.C., radar confusion, national panic, official explanations, and seventy-plus years of “sure, buddy” from both sides. If the tape is real, intact, and released, it will not automatically prove aliens, non-human intelligence, interdimensional plasma monks, or that your uncle was right about the saucer behind Sears.

But it may matter anyway.

The skeptic view: An old tape is not proof of extraordinary visitation. It may simply show officials discussing confusing radar events, weather effects, military uncertainty, or public-relations panic. Historical intrigue is not the same thing as physical evidence. AARO’s official posture remains that UAP require scientific, data-driven evaluation, not mythological touchdown dances. [2]

The disclosure view: Records matter. Historical records especially matter. If the government has old tapes, memos, radar logs, photos, or internal discussions, release them. Let historians, scientists, journalists, and the public examine the actual material instead of arguing forever over campfire summaries and redacted ghost paper.

FMPU opinion: This is where the UFO story gets deliciously weird.

The future of disclosure may not arrive as a new video from a fighter jet. It may arrive as an old recording from the Cold War attic — dusty, bureaucratic, probably boring in stretches, and still powerful because it shows how the state talked about the unknown when it thought the public was not listening.

That is the Magic Pop angle. UFO culture is not just about sightings. It is about media artifacts: tapes, broadcasts, documents, photos, press conferences, leaks, clips, thumbnails, and rumors. The saucer is only half the object. The other half is the story system built around it.

And now the algorithm gets to chew on 1952 like it happened yesterday.

FMPU RADAR

Field Temperature: Hot
Credibility: Pending release
Media Hype: Rising fast
Government Transparency: Teasing the vault
Algorithmic Velocity: High
Rabbit Hole Potential: Extremely unhealthy after midnight

JP Prediction

If the tape drops, most people will not listen carefully. They will clip the spiciest ten seconds, declare victory, and start a civil war in the comments.

What Everyone Else Is Missing

Disclosure may not be the future arriving.

It may be the past finally getting a microphone.

Read More

jsm Saturday, July 04, 2026  No comment

FMPU Book/Essay Review: King-Kill/33 [1987]

The Essay That Called JFK a Put-On Before It Was Cool

Published on America's 250th birthday. Two hundred fifty years of history, and it's hard to point to a stranger, more corrosive mystery than what happened in Dallas on November 22, 1963 — not because of who may or may not have pulled a trigger, but because of what the unresolved doubt has done to the country's relationship with its own official story ever since. If disclosure culture today feels like a charade, this is arguably where the pattern started.

Bob Dylan got at the same idea, decades later, better than most historians have. His 2020 epic "Murder Most Foul" describes the assassination as the greatest magic trick ever pulled off in broad daylight — flawlessly executed, in full view of a watching crowd that somehow saw nothing. That's the "put-on" thesis in a single image: not a crime hidden in the dark, but a performance staged in the light, betting correctly that visibility itself would be mistaken for transparency.

The pitch: Sixty-three years on, the JFK assassination is still the most re-litigated murder in American history — and one of the strangest, most underground answers to "what really happened" might also be one of the more thought-provoking: that it was never meant to be fully solved. That it was meant to be read.

The crack in the official story

Start with the physics, because you don't need Freemasonry to know something's off. The single-bullet theory — one round supposedly tearing through Kennedy's neck, then Governor Connally's back, wrist, and thigh — has been under fire since the week the Warren Commission published it. Researchers like Josiah Thompson spent decades picking apart the trajectory math, and even government reviewers have never fully agreed with each other: the 1979 House Select Committee on Assassinations concluded there was probably a second gunman based on acoustic evidence, only for a 1982 National Academy of Sciences panel to conclude that acoustic evidence was garbage. Fifty years of official investigation and the government's own experts can't agree on their own conspiracy.

That's the opening nobody wants to say out loud on cable news: not "who really did it," but "what if the confusion is the point." A story this contested, this long, surviving this many contradictory official reviews, isn't a cold case. It's a designed ambiguity.

Enter Downard

James Shelby Downard's 1987 essay "King-Kill/33" (later expanded with Michael Hoffman II, and collected by Adam Gorightly in Stalking the Great Whore: The Lost Writings of James Shelby Downard) doesn't bother with ballistics. Downard's argument is that Dealey Plaza itself was a stage: the 33rd parallel, the street layout forming a "trident," Kennedy's solar-king imagery from inauguration to autopsy, all read as a ritual execution encoded in geography and numerology rather than concealed in it.

Whether or not you buy the Masonic numerology — and most of it is genuinely a stretch — the essay's real contribution isn't the specific symbols. It's the underlying claim that power doesn't always hide what it does. Sometimes it announces it, in a language most people aren't fluent enough to read, and dares you to notice.

Revelation of the method

That's the concept worth taking seriously on its own, independent of Downard and Hoffman's baggage: revelation of method — the idea that those orchestrating an event will symbolically broadcast it beforehand or during, not out of arrogance, but because (in this framing) the act only "counts," ritually or psychologically, if it's been announced to those paying attention. It's a lens that shows up far beyond JFK — in how agencies pre-brief narratives before news cycles even start, in how disclosure documents get pre-framed by friendly narrators before anyone can question them (sound familiar?). Once you have this framework, you start noticing the pattern in places that have nothing to do with Freemasonry: the announcement is the mechanism, not a slip-up.

The part we're not going to skip

Michael Hoffman II, who co-developed and popularized the essay, is a Holocaust denier whose broader work leans hard into antisemitic conspiracy framing. That's not a rumor or a reputational smear — it's the documented substance of his other writing. We're reviewing King-Kill/33 for the "put-on" thesis and the revelation-of-method concept, both of which stand on their own. We're not endorsing Hoffman's worldview to get there, and if you go looking for the original text, know what else is in the room.

FMPU verdict

King-Kill/33 is shaky history and shakier ballistics-adjacent numerology. But as an argument that the JFK story was built to be permanently unresolvable — a stage play with the ending deliberately left ambiguous — it got there well before the mainstream press was willing to seriously question the single-bullet theory. Strip away the Masonic scaffolding and you're left with the most FMPU idea in the whole book: the confusion may not be a failure of the cover-up. The confusion may be the cover-up.

On America's 250th, that's worth sitting with. A quarter-millennium in, and the country still can't agree on the facts of the day it lost a president in broad daylight, on camera, in front of a crowd. Maybe that's the real mystery — not who did it, but how a nation this good at documenting itself produced a story this permanently unsettled.

FMPU Book Reviews — taking the underground seriously enough to argue with it.

Read More

jsm Saturday, July 04, 2026  No comment

FMPU Intelligence Brief (Special Report) - MK Ultra

MKUltra: What the Documents Actually Say (vs. What Congress Wants You to Think They Say)

The nugget: MKUltra isn't a mystery. It's one of the best-documented abuses in CIA history — and that's exactly why the current circus around it is so obnoxious.

The actual paper trail

Start with what's real, because it's damning enough without embellishment. Between 1953 and 1964, the CIA ran 149 subprojects under the MKUltra umbrella, testing drugs and psychological manipulation on subjects who mostly had no idea they were being experimented on. The stated goal, straight from the CIA's own files: developing the ability to control a person completely — even overriding their own instinct for self-preservation.

That's not a conspiracy theorist's paraphrase. That's the agency's own language, declassified.

In 1973, CIA Director Richard Helms ordered the files destroyed — full stop, as Watergate closed in. But he missed a batch: roughly 20,000 pages had been misfiled in a financial records building and survived. A 1977 FOIA request from journalist John Marks cracked those open, and Marks later donated the whole set — 16,000 pages — to the National Security Archive, which finally published a curated, searchable collection of it in December 2024.

The nugget worth sitting with: the man who ran the program, chief chemist Sidney Gottlieb, testified to the Church Committee in October 1975 that after tallying the money, the risk, and the human cost, the program was probably not worth what it cost. That's the guy who built it, on the record, calling it a failure — not a whistleblower, not a leaker. Declassified testimony, sitting in an archive, free to read.

Where it gets edgy

Here's the part FMPU actually cares about: a congressional task force chaired by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna held a hearing this week — June 30 — billed as uncovering "the truth" of MKUltra. Except historians who've spent decades in these files are on record saying there's little chance the hearing reveals anything genuinely new about the well-documented Cold War abuses. The same committee has already been sidetracked chasing an ex-CIA staffer's unverified claim that the agency seized boxes of MKUltra files from the outgoing Director of National Intelligence's office — a claim both the CIA and that office deny.

That's the charade in miniature. There's a real, declassified, extensively sourced scandal sitting in an archive anyone can search — and the political theater around it keeps reaching past the real documents for a flashier, unverifiable story instead. Actual victims (soldiers dosed without consent, patients whose lives were wrecked) get less airtime than the hunt for a secret stash of "real" files that may not even exist.

The digestible takeaway

MKUltra: real, documented, declassified, searchable — not a mystery.

The man who ran it already told Congress, under oath, it wasn't worth it.

The current "declassification" hearings aren't digging up MKUltra's secrets — they're mining it for headlines while the actual archive sits underused.

If you want the primary sources yourself: National Security Archive ("CIA and the Behavioral Sciences" collection) and The Black Vault's MKUltra FOIA archive are both public and free.

FMPU Daily Brief — tracking the gap between what's been declassified and what gets talked about.

Read More

jsm Saturday, July 04, 2026  No comment

FMPU INTELLIGENCE BRIEF #002

Capitol Hill Got the UFO Bug. The Internet Got the Fever.

Verified reporting: The fastest-growing UAP topic right now is the post-forum blast radius from Disclosure Forum 2026, held June 25 in Washington, D.C., with lawmakers, scientists, whistleblower figures, and disclosure advocates pushing for UAP transparency. [1]

The forum’s full livestream and follow-up clips are circulating across YouTube, Yahoo/NewsNation coverage, Reddit, and X, with renewed attention on congressional pressure, declassification, and the eternal American question: “What exactly are you people hiding in the filing cabinets?” [2][3][4]

AARO, meanwhile, remains the adult in the room nobody invited to the afterparty. Its public position is still that UAP are objects or phenomena not immediately identifiable, and that cases require a scientific, data-driven process. [5] The government’s latest major release came June 12, when the Department of War posted a third tranche of UAP records under its disclosure system. [6]

So what happened?

Disclosure left the bunker and became content.

The skeptic view is fair: a forum is not proof. A viral clip is not a recovered craft. A retired official saying “questions remain” is not the same thing as “ET phoned Congress.” Recent mainstream coverage of the June file drops emphasized that the records include strange unresolved cases but no conclusive proof of extraterrestrial life. [7]

The disclosure view is also fair: pressure matters. Public hearings, forums, document releases, and lawmaker involvement are how taboo subjects become oversight issues. If UAP are drones, balloons, sensors, classified aircraft, plasma, or misread junk, then prove it cleanly. If they are something else, stop treating reality like a subscription-only government product.

FMPU opinion: The real story is not the forum. It is the machinery around the forum.

Scientists want instrumentation. Congress wants leverage. AARO wants procedure. MUFON keeps collecting civilian witness reports in the background. Reddit wants receipts. YouTube wants a thumbnail with a glowing saucer and a shocked face. X wants a public execution by quote-tweet.

And the algorithm wants the fight.

That is the new UFO field: not one clean disclosure road, but a five-lane pileup of science, secrecy, politics, entertainment, mythology, and Magic Pop. The object in the sky might be unidentified, but the object on the screen is perfectly clear: attention.

FMPU RADAR

Field Temperature: Hot
Credibility: Medium
Media Hype: High
Government Transparency: Moving slowly
Algorithmic Velocity: Very high
Rabbit Hole Potential: Nuclear after midnight

JP Prediction

The next wave will not come from one new UFO video. It will come from Congress trying to turn forum energy into hearings, amendments, subpoenas, or another records fight.

What Everyone Else Is Missing

Disclosure is no longer just about hidden evidence.

It is about who gets to manufacture meaning from the mystery.

Read More

jsm Thursday, July 02, 2026  No comment

The Purple People Eater

Read More

jsm Thursday, July 02, 2026  No comment