Reviewing the 2012 Internet

After reading a "debunker" blog today, I came the realization that the author Andrew certainly has its fine share of tiny shreds of fact, it is clear that you don't respect the works of some of the world's finest researchers. By lobbing all the significant meanings of what happens in 2012 with something as ridiculous as the GZM, you miss the serious aspects of forward thinking behind the reasoning it has reached the mainstream consciousness.

That's ok -- Andrew Mulligan Hoffman doesn't need to understand what he's writing about to know it doesn't agree with his sensibilities. Everyone else knows saying 2012 = mass destruction is cool to make a point! Unfortunately 2012 is not something that will pass in an insignificant way whether there is a devastating earthquake or a massive rave out in the California desert attended by old and young -- and believe me, there will be many across the globe, then the statement that the day will pass with insignificance is flat-lined. But readers of his blog know better.

Says Hoffman, "Choosing to take a position not supported by the mainstream media is laudable to a certain extent, but if we only think about the things the television tells us to think about, we’ve already lost."

Television? Really? Is this blog post reaching out to the 20% of Americans who don't use the internet? Oops. That was not one of the tiny shreds of fact I was referring to.

Ok, so what the author does here is conveniently leave out the fact that Dec. 21, 2012 is going to go down as the greatest party day in history -- outdoing Woodstock 100 fold and if we wake up in the morning on Dec. 22 and the world is still in tack, only to find out it has been take under complete control by a big, ugly, evil totalitarian government than finally it will be considered a case of the media's finest work yet. 

Har har -- to death n destruction!  Viva hate!